Email is a commonly employed means of communication among colleagues on a daily basis. However, it is worth noting that a significant number of individuals, inadvertently, engage in practices that may convey an impression of immaturity and diminished competence.
According to Deb Lee, a digital productivity coach and consultant, the failure to identify significant errors can be perceived as lacking professionalism and conveys a lack of attention to detail.
The following are examples of individuals that engage in email unprofessionalism:
1. Your email has spelling and grammar errors.
The experience of realizing that one has misspelt the name of the recipient evokes a profound sense of apprehension and distress.
According to Lee, the presence of spelling errors and grammatical faults might create an impression of carelessness, so diminishing one’s professional image.
In order to prevent these potentially embarrassing errors, it is advisable to thoroughly verify the spelling of the recipient’s name and any associated titles. Lee additionally proposed the practice of reading one’s email aloud as a means to identify errors. “You have a higher probability of detecting them when you perceive them,” she stated.
It is advisable to utilize the spell-checker feature provided by the majority of email programmed. Lee suggested the utilization of browser extension functionalities such as Speechify for Gmail or ReadMe, a text-to-speech tool designed for Chrome, which enables the audible reading of emails.
According to Lee, in the event of an error involving an individual’s name, it is imperative to provide apologies and ensure accuracy in subsequent instances.
2. You hit ‘reply all’ automatically.
Engaging all of your colleagues in a reply-all chain will result in you becoming the central figure in the workplace, which might have negative consequences.
According to career strategist Ana Goehner, a common error observed among individuals is the act of pressing the ‘reply all’ button without engaging in thoughtful consideration over the necessity of providing a response. You may become trapped in a sequence of ‘reply all’ messages, inundating your inbox with ‘Thank you’ or ‘Got it’. The superfluous and inconsequential messages exacerbate the overwhelming nature of people’s inboxes.
And refrain from adding to a reply-all and exacerbating the situation.
“There is frequently an anticipation that the sender of the email possesses superior knowledge not to inundate someone’s inbox, as they are also aware of the experience of receiving irrelevant emails,” Lee stated. “The lack of professionalism is evident as someone appears to be disregarding or being unaware of established email etiquette guidelines.”
“It is advisable to contact that individual or a particular group of individuals instead,” she proposed. “Transferring action steps from email to a project management tool such as Trello or Asana and allocating them to the appropriate individuals can be beneficial.”
According to Goerner, when sending an email to multiple recipients, it is crucial to utilise the BCC (blind carbon copy) field for each individual recipient.
The act of including certain individuals in the CC line and subsequently adding others to the BCC line might give rise to concerns surrounding trust and privacy, as it may result in individuals being unaware of the identities of other recipients on the BCC line. By implementing this approach universally, the “reply all” feature will be eliminated, so obscuring the personal addresses of the recipients.
According to Goehner, the utilization of the BCC field for all recipients can effectively safeguard the privacy of all individuals involved.
3. You’re too casual.
The utilization of cry-laughing emojis in formal professional correspondence may elicit disapproval from coworkers.
According to career consultant Kristine Knutter, professionals frequently appear unprofessional in their work emails when they exhibit excessive casualness, employ unfinished sentences, and utilize emoticons, resembling the informal nature of texting. Professionals should instead embrace a more formal demeanor, employing full words and refraining from using emojis.
The absence of body language cues might lead to the misinterpretation of friendly emoticons as scary or off-putting. Do not presume that your smiley emoji would be perceived as a kind smile when sent over email, for instance.
In a 2017 study published in the journal Social Psychological and Personality Science, researchers from the University of Amsterdam conducted a comparison between a text sent by a hypothetical new colleague that contained a smiley emoticon and a version of the text that did not include the emoticon. The participants in the study were 203 undergraduates. Both texts had identical phrases, however, in the smiley rendition, the greeting included the following: “I am pleased to collaborate with you and I recommend commencing immediately. :)” I anticipate collaborating with you. 🙂
The students assessed the greeting accompanied by a smiley as considerably less proficient compared to the greeting that solely consisted of words. What is the lesson? If you are uncertain, refrain from using GIFs and emoji responses with your real pals outside of the workplace.
Another aspect of informality that should be considered is an individual’s title. When encountering a receiver who is a doctor or professor, it is advisable to automatically include that title in your mails, unless they explicitly state otherwise in their email signoff.
4. You write long-winded emails.
It is undesirable to get an email from a colleague containing a treatise. Optimal emails are concise and direct. The most unfavorable ones elicit a heightened state of confusion.
Refrain from creating lengthy sections of text without any breaks between paragraphs. Individuals tend to quickly scan communications, and if your email is excessively lengthy, your recipient may overlook crucial information.
“To enhance clarity and facilitate comprehension, it is advisable to divide your emails into concise sentences and paragraphs, incorporating bullet points,” Knutter suggested. It is imperative to explicitly articulate the requirements from the receiver and any associated deadlines at the outset.
In order to be a proficient communicator, it is essential to recognize the appropriate moment to transition the conversation to an offline setting. According to Goehner, if an email is evolving into a narrative, it serves as an indication to employ an alternative mode of communication such as a formal explanatory paper or a telephone conversation.
“Occasionally, a telephone conversation or even a video recorded on a screen is more direct than typing a lengthy list of instructions in an email,” she stated. Individuals have varying preferences when it comes to receiving information. For many individuals, auditory and visual aids can be more beneficial than textual information.
5. You fire off an email when you’re angry.
Emails act as more than mere communication tools; they can also function as a means of documenting one’s behavior. Hence, it is imperative to refrain from sending a message when experiencing anger, since it may result in irreversible consequences.
“Demonstrating your colleagues through email is a significant error.” “Expressing frustration about a meeting can be alluring, but it is not professional and can even result in termination,” stated career advisor Anne Genduso.
Exercise caution with your mental condition and refrain from sending emails during such instances. Instead, assume accountability for your professional communication and allocate sufficient time for introspection prior to responding.
Goehner said that when you experience an increase in your anger, you should engage in activities such as taking a walk or recording your initial email draft in a Word document that you do not save. “It is a highly effective method for eliminating negative emotions from your mind,” she stated.
As a general guideline, it is advisable to only send emails that you feel at ease expressing to someone directly. “Avoid writing anything that you would not express to someone face-to-face,” Goehner advised. “Do not conceal yourself behind the message.”
